Page 1 of 1

Another old topic.

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:55 am
by Lucifer_Spades
What happend with this one did the skull ever get proven or diproven? What happend to Sneaky's remains? i haven't seen any Bluey skeleton pics.

http://bluetongueskinks.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=302


sorry if people get annoyed I like to paruse old threads to see what I can find.

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:22 pm
by Felmarg
I am also very curious about this. It's a skull mystery! If this gets proven they could make a movie. I would watch it. I does seem like it isn't a skink skull though because it looks like more teeth where in the front that fell out....

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:07 pm
by Dawn
uh yeah....welll, I had no luck finding dry ice back then in my remote little town. And then I gave birth to our daughter and moved to France all during that 4 month stretch of time. I guess it got put on the back burner and never sent him :shame: I think he was probably disposed of when my hubby cleaned out our deep freeze before we sold it to move. My bad.

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:23 pm
by Zach
Haha, I had forgotten all about that.

I like your signature, Dawn. I've been involved with coalition on campus for Darfur.

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 2:24 pm
by Dawn
Zach wrote:Haha, I had forgotten all about that.

I like your signature, Dawn. I've been involved with coalition on campus for Darfur.


There isn't much going on about it here. :roll: I have the "not on our watch" signs in my yard and get dirty looks from the property manager every monday and wednesday. (home owners association :doh: ) It is so frustrating to see what we allow to go on in the world and what the media sees as "newsworthy".

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:04 pm
by KyleWeiss
Actually if anyone is going to revive an old thread, starting a new thread with a link to the old one is probably best. That way no one is confused.

:noknow:

KW

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:07 pm
by Tigergenesis
KyleWeiss wrote:Actually if anyone is going to revive an old thread, starting a new thread with a link to the old one is probably best. That way no one is confused.

:noknow:

KW


I was thinking the same thing

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:15 pm
by Lucifer_Spades
Tigergenesis wrote:
KyleWeiss wrote:Actually if anyone is going to revive an old thread, starting a new thread with a link to the old one is probably best. That way no one is confused.

:noknow:

KW


I was thinking the same thing


Isn't that what I did? I didn't do it wrong did I? :shock:

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:22 pm
by Zach
No, they're congratulating you essentially...what you did is much better than actually making a post in the old thread.

And if there's a question about an old topic, it's perfectly fine to create a thread with the question.

We will call it....."The Quigly Exception". :lol:

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:26 pm
by Lucifer_Spades
I feel so special!
Quigly would like to thank the Petco who matched us, the mom he can't remember, and the super worm he ate with dinner. Oh yeah and the acadamy. WORLD PEACE! :lol:

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:26 pm
by Dragontears
bluey head:
http://www.digimorph.org/specimens/Tiliqua_scincoides/

you can click on the image to enlarge...

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:56 am
by Tigergenesis
Lucifer_Spades wrote:I feel so special!
Quigly would like to thank the Petco who matched us, the mom he can't remember, and the super worm he ate with dinner. Oh yeah and the acadamy. WORLD PEACE! :lol:


:rofl:

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 12:35 pm
by KyleWeiss
Geez are we that heavy-handed here that mere mention of activity is reacted to with wincing and fear? :rofl: I mean about a year ago when I first started I was only beaten for about three months until I complied. :hehe:

It's our fault for thinking and pondering out loud -- :)

KW

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:23 pm
by Lucifer_Spades
You do realize that in a dominant submissive situation the submissive has as much power as the dominant. ;) Think on that awhile.

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:30 pm
by Zach
Dragontears wrote:bluey head:
http://www.digimorph.org/specimens/Tiliqua_scincoides/

you can click on the image to enlarge...



They finally did one!!! Sweet! That's about as close to a skull as we have...

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:30 pm
by Blotch
That doesn't really show much at all. Plus it's a 3d generated pic of what it probably looks like. I've posed the question to Richard regarding the dead baby bluey he found. Hopefully he says yes.

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 10:29 pm
by Dragontears
Blotch wrote:That doesn't really show much at all. Plus it's a 3d generated pic of what it probably looks like. I've posed the question to Richard regarding the dead baby bluey he found. Hopefully he says yes.


true, but it still looks pretty darn cool! ;)

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 10:40 pm
by Blotch
yeah it does - i'm into 3d artwork too so it would be cool to see more 3d blueys!

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:36 am
by Zach
Blotch wrote:That doesn't really show much at all. Plus it's a 3d generated pic of what it probably looks like. I've posed the question to Richard regarding the dead baby bluey he found. Hopefully he says yes.



You mean Colin?

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:47 am
by kvega92
We will have to wait and see